Ideology and agricultural technology in the late twentieth century: Biotechnology as symbol and substance [Book Review]
Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):5-15 (1993)
Abstract
The significance of biotechnology in agriculture during the late twentieth century has been as much in the realm of symbol and ideology as in its political economy. The ideological roots of biotechnology are long historical ones. The ideology of “productivism,” which was codified during mid-century out of a coincidence of interest among experiment stations, USDA, Congress, agribusiness, and agricultural commodity groups, has encountered numerous challenges since the 1970s. One of the major responses to the crisis of productionism was to forge a social definition of biotechnology as being a revolutionary technology. I conclude by discussing whether biotechnology, as both symbol and substance, is likely to be a basis for attempts to resuscitate productivism in the 1990s now that biotechnology is being demystified, its limits being appreciated, and its opposition still considerableMy notes
Similar books and articles
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
The ethics of agri-food biotechnology : how can an agricultural technology be so important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Agricultural biotechnology and the future benefits argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Crop Biotechnology for the Environment?Sven Ove Hansson & Karin Joelsson - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):759-770.
The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
Biotechnology is compatible with sustainable agriculture.Donald Duvick - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):112-125.
Agricultural biotechnology: Slow applications by large corporations. [REVIEW]Gerd Junne - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):40-46.
Impact of education on the attitudes of college students toward biotechnology.L. G. Sterling, C. K. Halbrendt & S. L. Kitto - 1993 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1):75-88.
Biotechnology: an agricultural revolution.Public Acceptability of Agricultural Biotechnology - 1995 - In T. B. Mepham, G. A. Tucker & J. Wiseman (eds.), Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham University Press.
An aretaic objection to agricultural biotechnology.Ronald Sandler - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):301-317.
Biotechnology is not compatible with sustainable agriculture.Martha L. Crouch - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):98-111.
Tailor-made biotechnologies: Possibilities for farmer-centered development. [REVIEW]Guido Ruivenkamp - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):26-30.
Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology. [REVIEW]Susanna Hornig Priest & Allen W. Gillespie - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):529-539.
The phoenix of ideology.Gayil Talshir - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):107-124.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-23
Downloads
30 (#391,727)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2013-11-23
Downloads
30 (#391,727)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Ever since Hightower: The politics of agricultural research activism in the molecular age.Frederick H. Buttel - 2005 - Agriculture and Human Values 22 (3):275-283.
The doctors of agrifood studies.Douglas H. Constance - forthcoming - Agriculture and Human Values:1-13.
Towards science-based techniques in agriculture.Pascal Byé & Maria Fonte - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):16-25.
The bST debate: The relationship between awareness and acceptance of technological advances. [REVIEW]David E. Smith, J. Robert Skalnik & Patricia C. Skalnik - 1997 - Agriculture and Human Values 14 (1):59-66.
References found in this work
Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex.Martin Kenney - 1987 - Journal of the History of Biology 20 (3):429-430.