Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing

Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mathematical statistics and metastatistical analysis.Andrés Rivadulla - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):211 - 236.
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
A new paradigm for hypothesis testing in medicine, with examination of the Neyman Pearson condition.G. William Moore, Grover M. Hutchins & Robert E. Miller - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (3).
The ego has landed! The .05 level of statistical significance is soft (fisher) rather than hard (neyman/pearson).Lester E. Krueger - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):207-208.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
Of Nulls and Norms.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:280 - 290.
Null hypothesis statistical testing and the balance between positive and negative approaches.Adam S. Goodie - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):338-339.
Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson.Lenhard Johannes - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
On the Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing.Spencer Graves - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-23.
A refutation of the Neyman-Pearson theory of testing.Stephen Spielman - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):201-222.
The logic of tests of significance.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (3):211-226.
Is social psychological research really so negatively biased?Aiden P. Gregg & Constantine Sedikides - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):340-341.
Die Falsifikation Statistischer Hypothesen/The falsification of statistical hypotheses.Max Albert - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):1-32.
Problems With Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST): What Do the Textbooks Say?George A. Morgan - unknown
Did Pearson reject the Neyman-Pearson philosophy of statistics?Deborah G. Mayo - 1992 - Synthese 90 (2):233 - 262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
18 (#832,589)

6 months
10 (#268,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Replicability Crisis and Scientific Reforms: Overlooked Issues and Unmet Challenges.Mattia Andreoletti - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):135-151.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A refutation of the Neyman-Pearson theory of testing.Stephen Spielman - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):201-222.
Tests of significance following R. A. Fisher.D. J. Johnstone - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):481-499.

View all 7 references / Add more references