On the Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-23 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A refutation of the Neyman-Pearson theory of testing.Stephen Spielman - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):201-222.
Of Nulls and Norms.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:280 - 290.
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
The logic of tests of significance.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (3):211-226.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#396,067)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Logic of Statistical Inference.Ian Hacking - 1965 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Theory of Probability.Harold Jeffreys - 1939 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Theory of Probability.Harold Jeffreys - 1940 - Philosophy of Science 7 (2):263-264.
On the Foundations of Statistical Inference.Allan Birnbaum - 1962 - Journal of the American Statistical Association 57 (298):269--306.
A falsifying rule for probability statements.Donald A. Gillies - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):231-261.

View all 7 references / Add more references