Buddhism, euthanasia and the sanctity of life

Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):309-13 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Damien and John Keown claim that there is important common ground between Buddhism and Christianity on the issue of euthanasia and that both traditions oppose it for similar reasons in order to espouse a "sanctity of life" position. I argue that the appearance of consensus is partly created by their failure to specify clearly enough certain key notions in the argument: particularly Buddhism, euthanasia and the sanctity of life. Once this is done, the Keowns' central claims can be seen to be either false or only restrictedly true

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-04

Downloads
102 (#172,010)

6 months
14 (#184,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Damien Keown: Buddhism and bioethics.Dermot Feenan - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):401-405.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Should the Baby Live?Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1985 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Nature of Buddhist Ethics.Damien Keown - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (2):252-254.
Egoism, altruism and intentionalism in buddhist ethics.RoyW Perrett - 1987 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 15 (1):71-85.

Add more references