- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Epistemic and Ontic Theories of Explanation and Confirmation
Kagaku Tetsugaku 28:31-45 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Evidential Relevance and the Grue Paradox.Robert T. Pennock - 1998 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 31 (1):101-119.
Consciousness, Certainty, and Epistemic Operators.Masaharu Mizumoto - 2005 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 38 (1):1-15.
The Evolution of Altruism and Selective Explanation.Senji Tanaka - 2008 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 41 (1):1-13.
Dray's rational explanation in the study of history.Hiromichi Saito - 1971 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 4:63-75.
The Limit of Hypothetico-Deductive Model of Scientific Explanation.Gen-Ichiro Nagasaka - 1969 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 2:99-109.
The Elucidation of Plurality of Epistemic Norms with the Knowledge Model of Attributor Contextualism.Keiichi Yamada - 2011 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 44 (1):35-47.
Tower of Babel: The Evidence against the New Creationism. By Robert T. Pennock.N. Gray - 2001 - The European Legacy 6 (6):840-841.
Ontic or epistemic conception of explanation: A misleading distinction?Michał Oleksowicz - 2023 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 74:259-291.
What's Wrong with the Pragmatic-Ontic Account of Mechanistic Explanation?Alexander Reutlinger - 2011 - In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalo, Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann & Marcel Weber (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Springer. pp. 141--152.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-11-17
Downloads
33 (#500,650)
6 months
6 (#587,658)
2011-11-17
Downloads
33 (#500,650)
6 months
6 (#587,658)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
References found in this work
Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World.Wesley C. Salmon - 1984 - Princeton University Press.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Aspects of scientific explanation.Carl G. Hempel - 1965 - In Carl Gustav Hempel (ed.), Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press. pp. 504.
Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo