Metaphilosophy 37 (2):240–253 (2006)

Jeanne Peijnenburg
University of Groningen
A distinction is made between imagination in the narrow sense and in the broad sense. Narrow imagination is characterised as the ability to "see" pictures in the mind's eye or to "hear" melodies in the head. Broad imagination is taken to be the faculty of creating, either in the strict sense of making something ex nihilo or in the looser sense of seeing patterns in some data. The article focuses on a particular sort of broad imagination, the kind that has to do with creating, not a work of art, a scientific theory or a political vision but one's own life. We shape our lives through our actions, and these actions not only influence our future—a commonplace—but also determine our past, which is a new and more controversial perspective.
Keywords imagination  self‐determination  retrocausality  action
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00424.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Our Relations with the Past.Mark Day - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (4):417-427.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #164,389 of 2,507,713 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,713 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes