- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Response to “Getting to the Bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line’”
Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):105-110 (2007)
Abstract
Wayne Norman and Chris MacDonald launch a strong attack against Triple Bottom Line or 3BL accounting in their article “Gettingto the Bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line’” (2004). This response suggests that, while limitations to 3BL accounting do exist, the critique of Norman and MacDonald is deeply flawed.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Response to “Getting to the Bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line’”.Chris Macdonald & Wayne Norman - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):105-110.
Rescuing the Baby From the Triple-Bottom-Line.Chris MacDonald & Wayne Norman - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):111-114.
Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”.Chris MacDonald - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262.
John Elkington, Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business.John Elkington - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):229-231.
Triple bottom line – a vaulting ambition?Jan Tullberg - 2012 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 21 (3):310-324.
Sustainable Innovativeness and the Triple Bottom Line: The Role of Organizational Time Perspective.Annachiara Longoni & Raffaella Cagliano - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 151 (4):1097-1120.
A multi-dimensional criticism of the Triple Bottom Line reporting approach.Kaushik Sridhar - 2011 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 6 (1):49-67.
Triple bottom line - a vaulting ambition?Jan Tullberg - 2012 - Business Ethics: A European Review 21 (3):310-324.
John elkington, cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. [REVIEW]Ronald Jeurissen - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):229-231.
Triple bottom-line reporting as social grammar: integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate codes of conduct.Mollie Painter-Morland - 2006 - Business Ethics 15 (4):352-364.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
19 (#793,450)
6 months
6 (#700,858)
2011-01-09
Downloads
19 (#793,450)
6 months
6 (#700,858)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Rescuing the Baby From the Triple-Bottom-Line.Chris MacDonald & Wayne Norman - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):111-114.
In Defense of a Utilitarian Business Ethic.Andrew Gustafson - 2013 - Business and Society Review 118 (3):325-360.
Why Corporations Should Not Abandon Social Responsibility.Moses L. Pava - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4):805-812.
Resources and Capabilities of Triple Bottom Line Firms: Going Over Old or Breaking New Ground?Ante Glavas & Jenny Mish - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 127 (3):623-642.
Operationalizing stakeholder theory and prioritizing ethics in MBA programs: The utility of a trust approach.S. Duane Hansen, Matthew Mouritsen, James H. Davis & David Noack - 2019 - Business and Society Review 124 (4):523-541.
References found in this work
Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”.Chris MacDonald - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-5pqs9 uwo