- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Symposium on Ripstein's Force and Freedom: Introduction
European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):447-449 (2012)
Abstract
This introduction provides a very brief sketch of the fundamental claims of Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom before locating the criticisms of his interlocutors in relation to those claims. Valentini and Sangiovanni are situated as critics of the Kantian frame, while Ronzoni and Williams are critics situated within that frameMy notes
Similar books and articles
Right and ethics : Arthur Ripstein's force and freedom.Allen Wood - 2017 - In Sari Kisilevsky & Martin Jay Stone (eds.), Freedom and Force: Essays on Kant’s Legal Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
Kant, Ripstein and the Circle of Freedom: A Critical Note.Laura Valentini - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):450-459.
Freedom and Force: Essays on Kant’s Legal Philosophy.Sari Kisilevsky & Martin Jay Stone (eds.) - 2017 - Portland, Oregon: Bloomsbury.
Coercion and the Grounds of Legal Obligation: Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom.George Pavlakos - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):305-316.
Innate Right and Acquired Right in Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom.Katrin Flikschuh - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):295-304.
Form and Matter in Kantian Political Philosophy: A Reply.Arthur Ripstein - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):487-496.
A regime of equal private freedom? : individual rights and public law in ripstein's force and freedom.Katrin Flikschuh - 2017 - In Sari Kisilevsky & Martin Jay Stone (eds.), Freedom and Force: Essays on Kant’s Legal Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
Why is willing irrelevant to the grounding of (any) obligation? : remarks on Arthur Ripstein's conception of omni-lateral willing.George Pavlakos - 2017 - In Sari Kisilevsky & Martin Jay Stone (eds.), Freedom and Force: Essays on Kant’s Legal Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
Rights and interests in Ripstein's Kant.Andrea Sangiovanni - 2017 - In Sari Kisilevsky & Martin Jay Stone (eds.), Freedom and Force: Essays on Kant’s Legal Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
Critical Notice of Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom. [REVIEW]Kyla Ebels-Duggan - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):549-573.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-08-27
Downloads
44 (#372,384)
6 months
5 (#710,311)
2012-08-27
Downloads
44 (#372,384)
6 months
5 (#710,311)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Force and freedom: Kant's legal and political philosophy.Arthur Ripstein - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Kant, Ripstein and the Circle of Freedom: A Critical Note.Laura Valentini - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):450-459.
Can the Innate Right to Freedom Alone Ground a System of Public and Private Rights?Andrea Sangiovanni - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):460-469.
Between Ethics and Right: Kantian Politics and Democratic Purposes.Garrath Williams - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):479-486.
Politics and the Contingent: A Plea For A More Embedded Account of Freedom as Independence.Miriam Ronzoni - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):470-478.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo