Heythrop Journal 54 (5):784-795 (2013)
AbstractThis paper explores differing accounts of the nature of desire, found in the works of Bernard Lonergan and René Girard, and their implications for our understanding of the origins or socio-cultural order. Using Lonergan's distinction between natural and elicited desires it argues that Girard's account of desire as mimetic may account for elicited desire, but may not account for natural desire, in Lonergan's account, as desire for meaning, truth and goodness. It then considers the implications for this distinction in our understanding of our socio-cultural origins
Similar books and articles
Lonergan and Girard on Sacralization and Desacralization.Robert M. Doran - 2007 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 63 (4):1171 - 1201.
Democracy Versus Republic: Inclusion and Desire in Social Struggles.Renato Janine Ribeiro - 2008 - Diogenes 55 (4):45-53.
Metaphysical Desire in Girard and Plato.Sherwood Belangia - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):197-209.
Simone Weil and René Girard: Violence and the Sacred.Marie Cabaud Meaney - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):565-587.
The Unconscious and Conscious Self: The Nature of Psychical Unity in Freud and Lonergan.Paul Symington - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):563-580.
The Goodness of Being in Lonergan’s Insight.Patrick H. Byrne - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):43-72.
Desire Fulfillment and Posthumous Harm.Douglas W. Portmore - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):27 - 38.
Imitating Christ's Cross: Lonergan and Girard on How and Why.Mark T. Miller - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (2):859-879.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads