Democracy versus Republic: Inclusion and Desire in Social Struggles

Diogenes 55 (4):45-53 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper argues that the idea of inclusion is linked to the democratic tradition rather than to the republican one. By analyzing the origins and meaning of these two concepts, the author holds that democracy is rather linked to desire and republic to will (and to the expression of desire), and concludes that, since North Atlantic political tradition has not given a key role to desire, democracy, in order to overcome the difficulties it has been encountering in all parts of the world, should take more account of desire and of the social struggles it brings to the fore



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conflicts of Desire.Steven Arkonovich - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (1):51-63.
What is mimetic desire?Paisley Livingston - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):291 – 305.
From fight to debate: Machiavelli and the revolt of the ciompi.Martine Leibovici - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (6):647-660.
Desire, Democracy and Education.Ulla Thøgersen - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (4):400-410.
Preferentism and the paradox of desire.Bradford Skow - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2009 (3):1-17.
Philosophy and Desire.Hugh J. Silverman (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge.


Added to PP

22 (#692,982)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references