Maydole on Ontological Arguments

In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is an assessment of Robert Maydole's work on ontological arguments. (Bibliographical details are provided in the text.) I argue that Maydole's ontological arguments are unsuccessful.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Maydole.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445-68.
Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Philo 7 (2):203-211.
Response to MaydoIe.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--487.
Higher-order ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.
Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. [REVIEW]Richard M. Gale - 1995 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 58 (3):715-719.
Ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (193):553-555.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-29

Downloads
271 (#77,649)

6 months
74 (#76,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Response to Maydole.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445-68.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Ontological Argument.Robert E. Maydole - 2009 - In William Lane Craig & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 553–592.
The ontological argument. Anselm & Gaunilo - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring philosophy of religion: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references