How neuroscience might advance the law

In Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough (eds.), Law and the Brain. Oxford University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Michael S. Pardo & Dennis Patterson - 2013 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA. Edited by Dennis M. Patterson.
For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything.Joshua Greene & Cohen & Jonathan - 2006 - In Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough (eds.), Law and the Brain. Oxford University Press.
A cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding causal reasoning and the law.Jonathan A. Fugelsang & Kevin N. Dunbar - 2006 - In Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough (eds.), Law and the Brain. Oxford University Press. pp. 157--166.
A cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding causal reasoning and the law.Jonathan Fugelsang & Dunbar & Kevin - 2006 - In Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough (eds.), Law and the Brain. Oxford University Press.
Law and the Brain.Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security.S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen (eds.) - 2021 - Palgrave Macmillan.
The emergence of consequential thought: evidence from neuroscience.Abigail Baird & Fugelsang & Jonathan - 2006 - In Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough (eds.), Law and the Brain. Oxford University Press.
The impact of neuroscience on health law.Stacey A. Tovino - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (2):101-117.
Mind-reading by brain-reading and criminal responsibility.Gideon Yaffe - 2016 - In Dennis Michael Patterson & Michael S. Pardo (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
6 Human action, neuroscience and the law.Alexander Mccall Smith - 2004 - In Dai Rees & Steven Rose (eds.), The New Brain Sciences: Perils and Prospects. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.
Minds, Brains, and Norms.Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references