Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience

&
New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA. Edited by Dennis M. Patterson (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book addresses the philosophical questions that arise when neuroscientific research and technology are applied in the legal system. The empirical, practical, ethical, and conceptual issues that Pardo and Patterson seek to redress will deeply influence how we negotiate and implement the fruits of neuroscience in law and policy in the future.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2015

Call number

K346.P36 2013

ISBN(s)

9780190253103   9780199812134   019025310X   0199812136
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

Conclusion

This concluding chapter presents some thoughts about the importance of philosophy for law and neuroscience and for the particular approach taken to the philosophical challenges. It argues that no work on law and neuroscience can ignore fundamental philosophical issues, and that clarity and... see more

Similar books and articles

Book Review: Minds, Brains, and the Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience. [REVIEW]Karen Breda - unknown
Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused?Neil Levy - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):171-185.
No Nonsense Neuro-law.Sarah K. Robins & Carl F. Craver - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):195-203.
More on the Conceptual and the Empirical: Misunderstandings, Clarifications, and Replies. [REVIEW]Michael S. Pardo & Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):215-222.
Neural machinery and realization.Thomas W. Polger - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):997-1006.
Brain, Behavior, and Knowledge.Walter Glannon - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):191-194.
Unifying Approaches to the Unity of Consciousness Minds, Brains and Machines Susan Stuart.Brains Minds - 2005 - In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition. pp. 4--259.
Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Dennis Michael Patterson & Michael S. Pardo (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Minds, Brains, Computers: An Historical Introduction to the Foundations of Cognitive Science.Robert M. Harnish (ed.) - 2000 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Minds, Brains, and Norms.Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.
Beautiful minds (I.E., Brains) and the neural basis of intelligence.Richard J. Haier & Rex E. Jung - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (2):174-178.
Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience.Max R. Bennett & P. M. S. Hacker - 2003 - Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by P. M. S. Hacker.
Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience.M. R. Bennett & P. M. S. Hacker - 2003 - Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by P. M. S. Hacker.
Review of The Mind Incarnate by Lawrence A. Shapiro. [REVIEW]Thomas W. Polger - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Science 8:394-95.
Brains, Neuroscience, and Animalism: On the Implications of Thinking Brains.Carl Gillett - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (S1):41-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-12

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity.Thomas Douglas & Lisa Forsberg - 2021 - In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave Macmillan.
Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused?Neil Levy - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):171-185.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references