Digitally deconstructing ‘straw man’ and ‘wicker man’ arguments: A software-aided pedagogy

Argument and Computation 9 (3):193-222 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Straw Man.Scott Aikin & John Casey - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 223–226.
Straw Man Arguments.Scott Aikin & John Casey - 2022 - London, UK: Bloomsbury. Edited by John Casey.
Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
Straw Man or Straw Theory?Louis P. Pojman - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):169-180.
The straw man fallacy.Douglas Walton - 1996 - In Johan van Benthem (ed.), Logic and argumentation. New York: North-Holland. pp. 115--128.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.
The non-significance of straw man arguments.Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-25

Downloads
23 (#673,499)

6 months
5 (#838,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Recognizing rhetoric in science policy arguments.Nancy L. Green - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (3):257-268.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.

Add more references