Straw Man or Straw Theory?

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):169-180 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I respond to Albert Mosley’s critique that I only attack straw men arguments against affirmative action by showing both that his own argument is a version of one of these “straw men” and that his objections to my arguments can be rebutted.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
Policies of Straw or Policies of Inclusion? [REVIEW]Albert Mosley - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):161-168.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.
Tortuous dualism.Michael Levin - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (6):313-22.
The non-significance of straw man arguments.Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.
A straw man's neogenome.Oscar Vilarroya - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):380 - 381.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
60 (#262,991)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Louis P. Pojman
PhD: Oxford University

Citations of this work

Affirmative action.Robert Fullinwider - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references