Cancel Culture: an Essentially Contested Concept?

Athena - Critical Inquiries in Law, Philosophy and Globalization 1 (2):I-X (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cancel culture is a form of societal self-defense that becomes prominent particularly during periods of substantial moral upheaval. It can lead to the polarization of incompatible viewpoints if it is indiscriminately demonized. In this brief editorial letter, I consider framing cancel culture as an essentially contested concept (ECC), according to the theory of Walter B. Gallie, with the aim of establishing a groundwork for a more productive discourse on it. In particular, I propose that intermediate agreements and principles of reasonableness can help refocus the debate on cancel culture towards democratic discourse, without blanket justification for every instance. In this context, asserting that cancel culture is an ECC does not dismiss the potential of achieving consensus on its shared core meaning or societal role. Like other similar ECCs, such as democracy or rule of law, it highlights the importance of contestations in shaping our collective understanding of the concept.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Situating Cancel Culture.Lara Millman - 2023 - Social Philosophy Today 39:119-137.
Politische Freiheit.Julian Nida-Rümelin - 2021 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 107 (1):29-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-03

Downloads
428 (#48,673)

6 months
253 (#11,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claudio Novelli
University of Bologna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references