NanoEthics 1 (1):31-46 (2007)

Most known technology serves to ingeniously adapt the world to the physical and mental limitations of human beings. Humankind has acquired awesome power with its rather limited means. Nanotechnological capabilities further this power. On some accounts, however, nanotechnological research will contribute to a rather different kind of technological development, namely one that changes human beings so as to remove or reduce their physical and mental limitations. The prospect of this technological development has inspired a fair amount of ethical debate. Here, proponents and opponents of such visions of human enhancement are criticized alike for engaging in speculative ethics. This critique exposes a general pattern that extends to other nano-, bio-, or neuroethical debates. While it does not apply to all discussions of “enhancement technologies” it does apply to all ethical discourse that constructs and validates an incredible future which it only then proceeds to endorse or critique. This discourse violates conditions of intelligibility, squanders the scarce and valuable resource of ethical concern, and misleads by casting remote possibilities or philosophical thought-experiments as foresight about likely technical developments. In effect, it deflects consideration from the transformative technologies of the present.
Keywords Responsible ethics  Imagined futures overwhelm the actual present  Technology that adapts the world to limited humans vs. technology as a means to transcend human limits  Enhancement effects vs. the enhancement of human capabilities  Critiques of the human enhancement discourse  Scenario methods  Presuppositions vs. long-term consequences of research  Identifying potentially transformative research  Moving beyond consequentalism and deontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.Ibo van de Poel - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):667-686.

View all 83 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
147 ( #75,024 of 2,463,152 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,428 of 2,463,152 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes