Plenitude, Pluralism, and Neo-Lockean Persons

Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (11-12):108-131 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper discusses the arguments for and against animalism and concludes that a pluralist position which rejects animalism and embraces a multiplicity of thinkers is the best option.

Similar books and articles

Locke on the Ontology of Persons.Jessica Gordon-Roth - 2015 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):97-123.
Logical Problems for Lockean Persons.David Welker - 1984 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 21 (1):115-132.
Animalism versus lockeanism: No contest.David Mackie - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):369-376.
The Lockean Enough-and-as-Good Proviso: An Internal Critique.Helga Varden - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):410-442.
Persons, animals, and identity.Sydney Shoemaker - 2007 - Synthese 162 (3):313 - 324.
Capitalist Persons.Andrew Levine - 1988 - Social Philosophy and Policy 6 (1):39.
How to save Aristotle from modal collapse.Derek von Barandy - 2013 - Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (1):89-98.
Neo-Aristotelian Plenitude.Ross Inman - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):583-597.
Animalism and Person Essentialism.Kevin W. Sharpe - 2015 - Metaphysica 16 (1):53-72.
Defending religious pluralism for religious education.Andrew Davis - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
Psychological Criteria of Personal Identity.Melinda Allien Roberts - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-16

Downloads
219 (#91,082)

6 months
86 (#55,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Harold Noonan
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references