Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The turn to affect: A critique.Ruth Leys - 2011 - Critical Inquiry 37 (3):434-472.
Like-Minded.Adam Frank & Elizabeth A. Wilson - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):870-877.
ILike-Minded.Adam Frank & Elizabeth A. Wilson - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):870-877.
Image and Trauma.Ruth Leys - 2006 - Science in Context 19 (1):137-149.
Genealogy as critique?Tyler Krupp - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):315-337.
Theater of the Absurd.James I. Porter - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2):313-336.
IIIFacts and Moods: Reply to My Critics.Ruth Leys - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):882-891.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-26

Downloads
16 (#905,800)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references