Critical Response II - Affect and Intention: A Reply to William E. Connolly

Critical Inquiry 37 (4):799-805 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

William Connolly is in error when he remarks that I begin my article with a discussion of scientific accounts that reduce the emotions to a few genetically wired categories and that I suggest that the cultural theorists who are interested in affect are driven in the same reductive direction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Like-Minded.Adam Frank & Elizabeth A. Wilson - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):870-877.
ILike-Minded.Adam Frank & Elizabeth A. Wilson - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):870-877.
IIIFacts and Moods: Reply to My Critics.Ruth Leys - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):882-891.
Democracy, pluralism and political theory.William E. Connolly - 2007 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Edited by Samuel Allen Chambers & Terrell Carver.
Why I Am Not a Secularist.William E. Connolly - 1999 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Democracy, pluralism and political theory.William E. Connolly - 2007 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Edited by Samuel Allen Chambers & Terrell Carver.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
44 (#353,833)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references