Perspectives on Science 30 (2):260-283 (2022)

Authors
Philip J. Nickel
Eindhoven University of Technology
Abstract
This paper explores the role of moral uncertainty in explaining the morally disruptive character of new technologies. We argue that existing accounts of technomoral change do not fully explain its disruptiveness. This explanatory gap can be bridged by examining the epistemic dimensions of technomoral change, focusing on moral uncertainty and inquiry. To develop this account, we examine three historical cases: the introduction of the early pregnancy test, the contraception pill, and brain death. The resulting account highlights what we call “differential disruption” and provides a resource for fields such as technology assessment, ethics of technology, and responsible innovation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc_a_00414
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Uncertainty.Krister Bykvist - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (3):e12408.
Theory of Valuation.John Dewey - 1939 - Philosophy of Science 6 (4):490-491.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nanotechnology and Technomoral Change.Tsjalling Swierstra - 2013 - Etica E Politica 15 (1):200-219.
Whose Art Are We Talking About?Ike Kamphof - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (2):429-432.
COVID-19, Uncertainty, and Moral Experiments.Ibo Van de Poel & Michael Klenk - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (1):1-5.
Disruptive Innovation and Moral Uncertainty.Philip J. Nickel - forthcoming - NanoEthics: Studies in New and Emerging Technologies.
Moral Uncertainty and the Criminal Law.Christian Barry & Patrick Tomlin - 2019 - In Kimberly Ferzan & Larry Alexander (eds.), Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. New York: Palgrave.
Moral Uncertainty.Krister Bykvist - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (3):e12408.
Making Sense of Explanatory Objections to Moral Realism.Elizabeth Tropman - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):37-50.
Non-Ideal Prescriptions for the Morally Uncertain.Amelia Hicks - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (4):1039-1064.
Moral Uncertainty and the Criminal Law.Christian Barry & Patrick Tomlin - 2019 - In Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Springer Verlag. pp. 445-467.
Moral Uncertainty and Value Comparison.Amelia Hicks - 2018 - In Russ Shafer Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 13. Oxford, UK: pp. 161-183.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-01-19

Total views
9 ( #947,384 of 2,499,061 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #80,224 of 2,499,061 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes