Moral Uncertainty in Technomoral Change: Bridging the Explanatory Gap

Abstract

This paper explores the role of moral uncertainty in explaining the morally disruptive character of new technologies. We argue that existing accounts of technomoral change do not fully explain its disruptiveness. This explanatory gap can be bridged by examining the epistemic dimensions of technomoral change, focusing on moral uncertainty and inquiry. To develop this account, we examine three historical cases: the introduction of the early pregnancy test, the contraception pill, and brain death. The resulting account highlights what we call “differential disruption” and provides a resource for fields such as technology assessment, ethics of technology, and responsible innovation.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Nanotechnology and Technomoral Change.Tsjalling Swierstra - 2013 - Etica E Politica 15 (1):200-219.
Disruptive Innovation and Moral Uncertainty.Philip J. Nickel - forthcoming - NanoEthics: Studies in New and Emerging Technologies.
Moral Uncertainty and the Criminal Law.Christian Barry & Patrick Tomlin - 2019 - In Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Springer Verlag. pp. 445-467.
Whose Art Are We Talking About?Ike Kamphof - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (2):429-432.
Consistency and Moral Change.Kathie Lynn Jenni - 1987 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
Moral uncertainty.Krister Bykvist - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (3):e12408.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-05

Downloads
536 (#36,250)

6 months
128 (#33,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip J. Nickel
Eindhoven University of Technology