Whose Art Are We Talking About?

Foundations of Science 22 (2):429-432 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jeannette Pols and Tamar Sharon kindly reviewed my case study of the art of living with technology as an engagement with technomoral change. I am indebted to them for their careful reading and critical suggestions to further elaborate the project. In my response I focus on the question whose art we are talking about, while further elucidating the reflexivity addressed in my essay. I conclude with some remarks on what we can learn from micro studies like the one presented for macro level thinking on the ‘art of becoming’ with technology in a surveillance society

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nanotechnology and Technomoral Change.Tsjalling Swierstra - 2013 - Etica E Politica 15 (1):200-219.
Telecare, Surveillance, and the Welfare State.Tom Sorell & Heather Draper - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):36-44.
Token-Reflexivity.Ori Simchen - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (4):173-193.
The Reflexivity of Change: The Case of Language Norms.Peter Suber - 1989 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 3 (2):100 - 129.
Realism and Contingency.Tom Brock & Mark Carrigan - 2015 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45 (3):377-396.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-29

Downloads
22 (#666,248)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references