'Tis all in pieces (separate RFs and CFs), all coherence gone

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):693-694 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that the separation between CF (contextual field) and RF (receptive field) in relation to the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) system is empirically questionable and that it is functionally unnecessary. In addition, the proposed suppression of unexpected information will in many cases be counterproductive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In search of common foundations for cortical computation.William A. Phillips & Wolf Singer - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):657-683.
Information: In the stimulus or in the context?Giulio Tononi & Gerald M. Edelman - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):698-700.
An internal teacher for neural computation.Dario Floreano - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):687-688.
Context rules.Steven L. Bressler - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):85-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#827,622)

6 months
4 (#1,005,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marius Usher
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references