- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Using the Lives of Children Who Are Thriving as a Baseline for Minimal Risk Is not Useful for IRB Determinations
American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):21-22 (2014)
Abstract
No abstractMy notes
Similar books and articles
On the Minimal Risk Threshold in Research With Children.Ariella Binik - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):3-12.
On the Minimal Risk Threshold in Research With Children: “Substantive Goods” and Other Criteria.Carlo Petrini - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):23-24.
The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk.Seema Shah - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):22 - 23.
Research with Radiation and Healthy Children: Greater than Minimal Risk.William L. Freeman - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (5):1.
Using the Minimal Risk Threshold for All “No-Benefit” Pediatric Studies.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):17-18.
Does Radiation Research in Healthy Children Pose Greater than Minimal Risk?Bonnie L. Specker & Eugene L. Saenger - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (5):5.
A Relative Standard for Minimal Risk is Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful to Children: Lessons from the Phambili Trial.Robert M. Nelson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):14 - 16.
Acceptable Approaches to Enrolling Adults Who Cannot Consent in More Than Minimal Risk Research.Marion Danis, David Wendler & Scott Kim - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):70-71.
Defining Minimal Risk and the Clinical Disconnect.Mark D. Fox, Michael R. Gomez & Ric T. Munoz - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):15-17.
Disability, Health, and Minimal Risk Thresholds.Christopher A. Riddle - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):25-26.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-08-15
Downloads
15 (#976,359)
6 months
5 (#710,311)
2014-08-15
Downloads
15 (#976,359)
6 months
5 (#710,311)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
On the Minimal Risk Threshold in Research With Children.Ariella Binik - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):3-12.
Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations.Celia B. Fisher - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):5-10.
Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
Risk Standards for Pediatric Research: Rethinking the Grimes Ruling.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
Risk standards for pediatric research: Rethinking the.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo