Equality and Partiality

New York, US: OUP Usa. Edited by Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Nagel addresses the conflict between the claims of the group and those of the individual. Nagel attempts to clarify the nature of the conflict – one of the most fundamental problems in moral and political theory – and argues that its reconciliation is the essential task of any legitimate political system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,408

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The justification of national partiality.Thomas Hurka - 1997 - In Jeff McMahan & Robert McKim (eds.), The Morality of Nationalism. New York, USA: Oxford Unversity Press. pp. 139-57.
Other minds: critical essays, 1969-1994.Thomas Nagel - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Luck Egalitarianism Interpretated and Defended.Richard J. Arneson - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):1-20.
Moral conflict and political legitimacy.Thomas Nagel - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):215-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-31

Downloads
307 (#57,564)

6 months
14 (#112,262)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Nagel
New York University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references