Limits: The World

In Equality and Partiality. New York, US: OUP Usa (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is a consequence of this account of political legitimacy that legitimate government will not always be possible. If fundamental interests or values are too radically opposed, it may be impossible to find enough common impartial motivation to support a framework within which all reasonable parties must agree they should be resolved. The license individuals have to concentrate on their own lives and those they specially care about is morally unproblematic, only if they can exercise it in the context of a just social order, which gives expression to their moral impersonal motives without encroaching unacceptably on the personal domain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inequality.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - In Equality and Partiality. New York, US: OUP Usa.
Equality and Partiality.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - New York, US: OUP Usa. Edited by Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland.
Two Standpoints.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - In Equality and Partiality. New York, US: OUP Usa.
Aquinas and modern consequentialism.Don Adams - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (4):395 – 417.
Toleration.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - In Equality and Partiality. New York, US: OUP Usa.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Nagel
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references