Rethinking the concept of the right to information privacy: a Japanese perspective

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 6 (3):233-245 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to reconsider the concept of the right to information privacy and to propose, from a Japanese perspective, a revised conception of this right that is suitable for the modern information society.Design/methodology/approachFirst, the concept of privacy and personal information protection in the information society is briefly explained. After that, confused situations in Japan caused by the enforcement of Act on the Protection of Personal Information are described followed by the analysis of the Japanese socio‐cultural circumstances surrounding privacy. Based on these, the effectiveness of the concept of the right to information privacy in the Japanese socio‐cultural and economic context is examined and the need to rethink the concept of the right to information privacy discussed. Finally, a revised conception of the right is proposed.FindingsIn view of the circumstances in Japan, the concept of the right to information privacy, defined as “an individual's right to control the circulation of information relating to him/herself”, as well as the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development's eight principles already become outdated in today's sophisticated information‐communication society. There is a need to control/restrict use of personal information so that individuals' autonomy and freedom is ensured in the current situation and to revise the concept of the right to information privacy based on this idea.Originality/valueThis paper proposes a revision of the concept of the right to information privacy focused on control of, not access to, use of personal information. The revised concept is defined so that individuals' autonomy and freedom is ensured even in the “informational transparent” society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Socio‐cultural analysis of personal information leakage in Japan.Yohko Orito & Kiyoshi Murata - 2008 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 6 (2):161-171.
Global ICT‐ethics: the case of privacy.Göran Collste - 2008 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 6 (1):76-87.
Information privacy, the right to receive information and (mobile) ICTs.Litska Strikwerda - 2010 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2 (2):27-40.
Privacy Rights and Public Information.Benedict Rumbold & James Wilson - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (1):3-25.
The right to privacy unveiled.Samuel C. Rickless - 2007 - San Diego Law Review 44 (1):773-799.
“Privacy by default” and active “informed consent” by layers.Amaya Noain-Sánchez - 2016 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 14 (2):124-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-19

Downloads
32 (#516,119)

6 months
9 (#355,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Attitudes towards information ethics: a view from Egypt.Omar E. M. Khalil & Ahmed A. S. Seleim - 2012 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 10 (4):240-261.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why privacy is important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
Towards a theory of privacy in the information age.James H. Moor - 1997 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 27 (3):27-32.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Privacy and Freedom.Alan F. Westin - 1970 - Science and Society 34 (3):360-363.
Reason, relativity, and responsibility in computer ethics.James H. Moor - 1998 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 28 (1):14-21.

View all 9 references / Add more references