- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Testing as a selection tool: Another old and sticky managerial human rights issue [Book Review]
Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820 (1989)
Abstract
The intent of this paper is to state testing's definition and purpose within the selection process. A brief review of the current trend toward the increased use of testing in the selection process. An actual example of the increased use of testing in both the public and private sector is illustrated. Some discussion regarding future trends of testing — Genetic Screening, Personality Test, Honesty Test, etc. are also presented as issues of concern.My notes
Similar books and articles
Parental authority, future autonomy, and assessing risks of predictive genetic testing in Minors.A. Boyce & P. Borry - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):379-385.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
Private and public eugenics: Genetic testing and screening in india. [REVIEW]Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
“Integrity testing” for personnel selection: An unsparing perspective. [REVIEW]Dan R. Dalton & Michael B. Metzger - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (2):147 - 156.
Drug testing and corporate responsibility: The “ought implies can” argument. [REVIEW]Jennifer Moore - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (4):279 - 287.
Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
The Ethics of Routine HIV Testing: A Respect-Based Analysis.Thaddeus Metz - 2005 - South African Journal on Human Rights 21 (3):370-405.
Provider-initiated hiv testing and counseling in health facilities – what does this mean for the health and human rights of pregnant women?Sofia Gruskin, Shahira Ahmed & Laura Ferguson - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):23–32.
Increasing knowledge of hiv infection status through opt-out testing.Harold W. Jaffe - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):229-233.
Privacy and the human genome project.David L. Wiesenthal & Neil I. Wiener - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):189 – 202.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#440,326)
6 months
2 (#1,192,610)
2009-01-28
Downloads
36 (#440,326)
6 months
2 (#1,192,610)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Silence as Complicity: Elements of a Corporate Duty to Speak Out Against the Violation of Human Rights.Florian Wettstein - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):37-61.
The new professor of theology.Jim Mackenzie - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (1):5–15.
The New Professor of Theology.Jim Mackenzie - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (1):5-15.
Organizational characteristics and HRM policies on rights: Exploring the patterns of connections. [REVIEW]Catherine E. Schwoerer, Douglas R. May & Benson Rosen - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (7):531 - 549.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-687984fc98-gtc9b uwo