Res Publica 16 (2):101-118 (2010)

Michael Davis
Illinois Institute of Technology
Those who commit crime on a grand scale, numbering their victims in the thousands, seem to pose a special problem both for consequentialist and for non-consequentialist theories of punishment, a problem the International Criminal Court makes practical. This paper argues that at least one non-consequentialist theory of punishment, the fairness theory, can provide a justification of punishment for great crimes. It does so by dividing the question into two parts, the one of proportion which it answers directly, and the other of ‘anchoring points’ which it assigns to a broader theory of enforcement (which may have a non-consequentialist or consequentialist version).
Keywords International criminal court  War crimes  Enforcement  Punishment  Crimes against humanity  Fairness theory  Retributivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-010-9109-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Should the Numbers Count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Persons and Punishment.Herbert Morris - 1968 - The Monist 52 (4):475-501.
Punishment.J. D. Mabbott - 1939 - Mind 48 (190):152-167.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment.Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):37-57.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Kant's Theory of Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):206.
Punishment, Communication and Community.Antony Duff - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
Punishing the Innocent — Unintentionally.Alan Wertheimer - 1977 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):45 – 65.


Added to PP index

Total views
65 ( #174,581 of 2,499,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,202 of 2,499,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes