A Polanyian Appraisal of Outcomes Assessment

Tradition and Discovery 45 (2):5-12 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While it is sensible to measure that which can be measured, outcomes assessment is completely out of step with Polanyi’s understanding of personal knowledge. Current assessment practices represent the revival of positivism in higher education. They ignore the tacit dimension of all knowledge, hinder the development of connoisseurship, and reinforce the power of the administrative class.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Polanyian in Spirit: A Reply to Gulick.Stephen Turner - 1998 - Tradition and Discovery 25 (1):12-20.
Poteat’s Use of Polanyi.David W. Rutledge - 2015 - Tradition and Discovery 42 (1):34-44.
The "Tacit" and the "Personal".Gabriella Ujlaki - 1994 - Tradition and Discovery 21 (2):8-10.
Between Praise and Appraisal.Willemien Otten - 2012 - Augustinian Studies 43 (1-2):201-218.
Who Was Michael Polanyi?David W. Rutledge - 2015 - Tradition and Discovery 42 (1):10-17.
The ends of outcomes assessment.Richard Gunderman - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):351-357.
Tacit Knowledge/Knowing and the Problem of Articulation.Zhenhua Yu - 2003 - Tradition and Discovery 30 (2):11-22.
Making Tacit Knowing Explicit.Kieran Cashell - 2008 - Tradition and Discovery 38 (2):48-59.
Why Do Gods Persist?: A Polanyian Reflection.John F. Haught - 2001 - Tradition and Discovery 28 (1):5-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-17

Downloads
3 (#1,713,658)

6 months
2 (#1,202,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references