Evangelical Catholicism and the Tacit Dimension of Theology [Book Review]

Tradition and Discovery 28 (1):31-32 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moleski responds to reviews of Personal Catholicism by Joseph Kroger and John Apcyznski. He argues that theology is tacit or rooted in tacit knowledge and therefore cannot be fully articulated. He portrays the Roman Catholic tradition as an interpretative framework that differs from scientific frameworks by being bound to a particular revelation made in history which is then preserved by a Specific Authority.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How “Catholic” Is Personal Catholicism?John V. Apczynski - 2001 - Tradition and Discovery 28 (1):28-30.
The "Tacit" and the "Personal".Gabriella Ujlaki - 1994 - Tradition and Discovery 21 (2):8-10.
When Tacit is Not Tacit Enough: A Heideggerian Critique of Collins’ “Tacit” Knowledge.Ben Trubody - 2013 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 5 (2):315-335.
At the Margins of Tacit Knowledge.Michael Lynch - 2013 - Philosophia Scientiae 17 (3):55-73.
Tacit Knowledge Meets Analytic Kantianism.Stephen Turner - 2014 - Tradition and Discovery 41 (1):33-47.
Personal Knowledge and Human Creativity.Percy Hammond - 2003 - Tradition and Discovery 30 (2):24-34.
From Tacit Knowing to a Theory of Faith.Richard L. Gelwick - 2014 - Tradition and Discovery 41 (1):10-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
40 (#347,838)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references