Human Rights Review 21 (2):181-205 (2020)

Authors
Lantz Fleming Miller
University of Twente
Abstract
Care is more than dispensing pills or cleaning beds. It is about responding to the entire patient. What is called “bedside manner” in medical personnel is a quality of treating the patient not as a mechanism but as a being—much like the caregiver—with desires, ideas, dreams, aspirations, and the gamut of mental and emotional character. As automata, answering an increasing functional need in care, are designed to enact care, the pressure is on their becoming more humanlike to carry out the function more effectively. The question becomes not merely whether the care automaton can effect good bedside manner but whether the patient’s response is not feeling deceived by the humanlikeness. It seems the device must be designed either to effect explicit mere human-“likeness,” thus likely undermining its bedside-manner potential, or to fool the patient completely. Neither option is attractive. This article examines the social problems of designing maximally humanlike care automata and how problems may start to erode the human rights of users/patients. The article then investigates the alternatives for dealing with this problem, whether by industrial and professional self-regulation or public-policy initiatives. It then frames the problem in the broader historical perspective in terms of previous bans, moratoria, and other means of control of hazardous and potentially rights-violating techniques and materials.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12142-020-00581-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Is Business Bluffing Ethical?Albert Z. Carr - forthcoming - Essentials of Business Ethics.
The Ethics of Care. Personal, Political, and Global.Virginia Held - 2007 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (2):399-399.
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.Aimee van Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Care, Communication and Conversation.Herman de Dijn - 2005 - Ethical Perspectives 12 (3):357-370.
Human Rights and the Care of the Self.Alexandre Lefebvre - 2018 - Durham: Duke University Press.
Concept of the Right to Health Care.Paulius Čelkis & Eglė Venckienė - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (1):269-286.
Adult Social Care and Property Rights.Brian Sloan - 2016 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2):428-458.
Surveying the Geneva Impasse: Coercive Care and Human Rights.Wayne Martin & Sándor Gurbai - 2019 - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 64:117-128.
Patients' Duties.Michael J. Meyer - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-02

Total views
69 ( #164,928 of 2,499,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #67,533 of 2,499,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes