Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature

& (eds.)
Oxford University Press USA (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this timely, provocative volume, essayists including Susan Moller Okin, Catherine A. MacKinnon, Cass Sunstein, Martha Minow, William Galston, and Sara McLanahan argue positions on sexuality, on the family, and on the proper role of law in these areas.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1998, 2010

ISBN(s)

9780195122879   0195122879   0195098943
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

David M. Estlund and Martha C. Nussbaum, eds., Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature:Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature. [REVIEW]Susan Dwyer - 1998 - Ethics 109 (1):184-187.
Book review: Janet L. Dolgin. Families: Law, gender and difference and defining the family: Law, technology, and reproduction in an uneasy age. By new York: New York university press, 1997. And David M. Estlund and Martha C. Nussbaum. Sex, preference, and family: Essays in law and nature. New York: Oxford university press, 1997. [REVIEW]David M. Adams - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (3):254-256.
Must the Family Be Just?Brian Penrose - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (3):189-221.
Book Review:Justice, Gender, and the Family. Susan Moller Okin. [REVIEW]Martha L. Fineman - 1991 - Ethics 101 (3):647-.
Interview with Martha C. Nussbaum.Fabrizia Abbate - 2012 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 5 (1).
Family fairness.Edna Ullmann-Margalit - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (2):575-596.
Defining the Family: Law, Technology, and Reproduction in an Uneasy Age.Janet L. Dolgin, David M. Estlund & Martha C. Nussbaum - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (3):254-256.
The Deep Side of Preference Theory.Antoine Billot - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (3):243-270.
Relational Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law.Martha Minow & Mary Lyndon Shanley - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (1):4 - 29.
Family systems and the preferred sex of children.Ananya Basu & M. Das Gupta - 2001 - In N. J. Smelser & B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. pp. 8--5350.
pp. 462-63. Susan Moller Okin suggests that one reasonable interpretation of Rawls's PL is that it requires that the family be internally subject to the two principles of justice. So, under this interpretation, patriarchal family forms might be disallowed by Rawls's theory. See Okin," Political Liberalism, Justice and Gender,".T. O. J. Rawls - 1994 - In Peter Singer (ed.), Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 105--23.
A Theory of Rationality.Michael James Webster - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Making the family functional: The case for legalized same-sex domestic partnerships.Larry A. Hickman - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):231-247.
An analysis of Susan Moller Okin’s problematic approach to multiculturalism. A feminist comprehensive liberalism gone wrong.Evelien Geerts - manuscript
El futuro del liberalismo feminista.Martha Nussbaum - 2001 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 13 (1):59-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-03

Downloads
12 (#1,075,977)

6 months
5 (#629,992)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Estlund
Brown University
Martha Nussbaum
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references