The Scientific Revolution and The Death of Nature

Isis 97:513-533 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, published in 1980, presented a view of the Scientific Revolution that challenged the hegemony of mechanistic science as a marker of progress. It argued that seventeenth‐century science could be implicated in the ecological crisis, the domination of nature, and the devaluation of women in the production of scientific knowledge. This essay offers a twenty‐five‐year retrospective of the book’s contributions to ecofeminism, environmental history, and reassessments of the Scientific Revolution. It also responds to challenges to the argument that Francis Bacon’s rhetoric legitimated the control of nature. Although Bacon did not use terms such as “the torture of nature,” his followers, with some justification, interpreted his rhetoric in that light

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and Scientific Revolution.Carolyn Merchant - 1981 - Journal of the History of Biology 14 (2):356-357.
Did a Scientific Revolution Occur in Linguistics?Morton E. Winston - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:25-33.
Philosophy in the information age.Terrell Ward Bynum - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (3):420-442.
The Rise of Modern Science: When and Why?R. Hooykaas - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (4):453-473.
Progress as a demarcation criterion for the sciences.Paul M. Quay - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
69 (#236,017)

6 months
12 (#210,071)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?