Aesthetic Illusion as a Connection of Cognitive Neural Basis, Art Appreciation and Modern Ideology

Philosophia 49 (4):1601-1617 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Illusion is a significant concept in philosophy, art history, literary theory and aesthetics. It has a concrete scientific basis in the perspective of modern cognitive neuroscience. Historically, it has been critically discussed by many philosophers, including Plato, Bacon, Descartes, Kant, and Nietzsche, who considered it to be a distortion of reality. Yet illusion is connected with so many basic aesthetic issues -- such as ambiguity, imagination, and imagery -- that it remains an indispensable concept in modern aesthetics. In the different art media communication of creators with appreciators involves illusory imagery. Its importance is emphasized by Ernst Gombrich in his Art and Illusion, one of the most influential art history texts in the English-speaking world. The concept of illusion becomes the crossing point of classical philosophy and contemporary aesthetics. In this article, the philosophical, psychological and aesthetic bases of illusion will be introduced. In different fields, illusion has different content, but depends on the same psychological mechanisms. The neural mechanisms that underpin aesthetic illusion in contemporary artistic production also function in the modern ideology described by Adorno, Eagleton, and Williams. Not all aesthetic illusions have positive functions, which sometimes leads to distorted cognition and emotional complexity. When it deviates too far from reality, aesthetic illusion contains particular cognitive emotional qualities that conflict with artistic imagery in classical arts. As a bearer of modern aesthetic emotion, it is also shaped by special economic and political situations and always has a kind of ideological character. Thus aesthetic illusion often promotes new configurations of aesthetics and art history.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aesthetic illusion.Me~Achem Brinker - 1977 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (2):191-196.
Illusions in painting: an attempt at philosophical interpretation.Mateusz Salwa - 2013 - New York: Peter Lang Edition. Edited by Katarzyna Krzyżagórska-Pisarek & Mateusz Salwa.
Adorno's Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion.Thomas Huhn - 1992 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (3):251-252.
Zuidervaart, Lambert. Adorno's Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion.Lambert Zuidervaart - 1992 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (3):251-252.
Looking at Animals Looking: Art, Illusion, and Power.Wj Thomas Mitchell - 1990 - In Frederick Burwick & Walter Pape (eds.), Aesthetic illusion: theoretical and historical approaches. New York: W. de Gruyter. pp. 65.
Looking at Animals Looking: Art, Illusion, and Power.I. Illusion - 1990 - In Frederick Burwick & Walter Pape (eds.), Aesthetic illusion: theoretical and historical approaches. New York: W. de Gruyter. pp. 65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-02

Downloads
16 (#227,957)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fanjun Meng
Tsinghua University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations