Illusions in painting: an attempt at philosophical interpretation

New York: Peter Lang Edition. Edited by Katarzyna Krzyżagórska-Pisarek & Mateusz Salwa (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book aims to present trompe-l'oeil painting as an ambigous aesthetic ideal offered by early modern theory of art. It embodies the idea of an image identical to what it represents. It is interpreted in terms of perceptual and aesthetic illusion, mimesis, diegesis, play, irony and scientific illustration.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foucault on painting.Catherine M. Soussloff - 2017 - Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Depicting.Roger Squires - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (169):193 - 204.
Painting and Philosophy.Michael Newall - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (4):225-237.
The Phenomenology of Painting.Nigel Wentworth - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Merleau-Ponty and the Other World of Painting: A Response.David Johnson - 2009 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (1):89-97.
Martin Heidegger on Painting: Franz Marc and Paul Klee.Una Popović - 2019 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 39 (2):445-460.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-19

Downloads
7 (#1,377,350)

6 months
5 (#629,992)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references