The Peculiar Nature of the Duty to Help During a Pandemic

Business Ethics Journal Review 9 (2):8-13 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Duties of beneficence are said to allow for leeway to discharge them. By distinguishing between two different types of leeway, Mejia identified three structurally different duties of beneficence. In this Commentary I deploy those distinctions to clarify the nature of a fourth type of duty of beneficence, one prompted by a global pandemic, a duty with a peculiar, and seldom recognized, conceptual logic. I provide some guidelines that should orient managers when they take themselves to be fulfilling such a duty on behalf of shareholders.

Similar books and articles

Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’.Samuel Mansell - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):583-599.
The Duty to Let Others Do Their Duty.Robert E. Goodin - 2020 - The Journal of Ethics 24 (1):1-10.
Open Duties.Alexander Jech - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):503-516.
Poverty and the Peril of Particulars.Jordan Arthur Thomson - 2020 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (4):661-677.
Kantian practical love.Melissa Seymour Fahmy - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):313-331.
Filial Obligation, Kant's Duty of Beneficence, and Need.Sarah Clark Miller - 2003 - In James Humber & Robert Almeder (eds.), Care of the Aged. Springer. pp. 169-197.
Legislative duty and the independence of law.J. H. Bogart - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.


Added to PP

192 (#92,370)

6 months
72 (#53,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Santiago Mejia
Fordham University

Citations of this work

Add more citations