Revolutionen und Bohème. 1917–1918

Studies in East European Thought 71 (1):11-26 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyzes the similarity of the revolutions of 1917–1918 with earlier revolutions in Russia and Germany. Several common characteristics are noted: “theatricality”, the connection of politics with Bohemianism, and politics’ concealed connection with art. The revolution presents a theatre stage on which representatives of the Boheme play their dreams out in politics. Furthermore, the article investigates methodological pluralism, which constitutes the philosophical foundation of Bohemianism. Finally, the author distinguishes two types of Bohemian politicians: the first type, a “fantasist, dreamer, poet,” is represented by Kurt Eisner, whereas the other type, that of a “multi-souled artist” is represented by Fyodor Stepun.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-12

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
15 (#941,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Alekseĭ Fedorovich Losev ; Sergeĭ Sergeevich Averint︠s︡ev.V. V. Bibikhin - 2004 - Moskva: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii Svi︠a︡togo Fomy.
Ot marksizma k idealizmu.Sergiĭ Bulgakov - 1968 - [Frankfurt a.M.,: "Posev"].
Ot marksizma k idealizmu.Sergiĭ Bulgakov - 1968 - [Frankfurt a.M.,: Posev.
Paul Tillich im Dialog mit dem Kultur- und Religionsphilosophen Fedor Stepun. Eine Korrespondenz im Zeichen von Bolschewismus und Nationalsozialismus.Alf Christophersen - 2011 - Journal for the History of Modern Theology/Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 18 (1):102-172.

Add more references