Abstract
I argue that Alvin Plantinga’s theory of warrant is plausible and that, contrary to the Pandora’s Box objection, there are certain serious world religions that cannot successfully use Plantinga’s epistemology to demonstrate that their beliefs could be warranted in the same way that Christian belief can be warranted. In arguing for, I deploy Ernest Sosa’s Swampman case to show that Plantinga’s proper function condition is a necessary condition for warrant. I then engage three objections to Plantinga’s theory of warrant, each of which attempts to demonstrate that his conditions for warrant are neither necessary nor sufficient. Having defended the plausibility of Plantinga’s theory of warrant, I present and expand his key arguments to the effect that naturalism cannot make use of it. These arguments provide the conceptual tools that are needed to argue for : that there are certain world religions that cannot legitimately use Plantinga’s theory of warrant to demonstrate that their beliefs could be warranted in the same way that Christian belief can be warranted.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

In Defense of Proper Functions.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In John Hawthorne & Tamar Gendler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Oxford University Press USA.
Warrant, Defeaters, and the Epistemic Basis of Religious Belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.
Plantinga and Favorable Mini-Environments.T. M. Botham - 2003 - Synthese 135 (3):431 - 441.
Plantinga on Warrant.Richard Swinburne - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (2):203-214.
Warrant and Analysis.Joel Pust - 2000 - Analysis 60 (1):51–57.
The Apologetical Implications of Alvin Plantinga's Epistemology.K. Scott Oliphint - 1994 - Dissertation, Westminster Theological Seminary
Plantinga on Warrant and Religious Belief.B. J. C. Madison - 2004 - Dissertation, King's College London
Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-28

Total views
29 ( #394,480 of 2,506,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes