Scientia et Fides 4 (1):77 (2016)

Authors
Domingos Faria
Universidade de Lisboa
Abstract
My aim in this paper is to critically assess two opposing theses about the epistemology of religious belief. The first one, developed by John Mackie, claims that belief in God can be justified or warranted only if there is a good argument for the existence of God. The second thesis, elaborated by Alvin Plantinga, holds that even if there is no such argument, belief in God can be justified or warranted. I contend that the first thesis is plausibly false, because belief in God is not just like a scientific hypothesis, and the second thesis is likely true if epistemic externalism is the correct view. However, even if the second thesis is true, I argue that to work on good arguments for God’s existence is unavoidable in order to cope with a new version of the Great Pumpkin objection, as well as to achieve other relevant purposes such as to convince rational observers outside the theistic community that belief in God is likely justified or warranted.
Keywords Epistemology of Religious Belief  Warrant  Theistic Belief  Natural Theology  Mackie  Plantinga
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.12775/setf.2016.006
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
On Human Nature.Edward O. Wilson - 1978 - Harvard University Press.
Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Oxford University Press USA.
.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Warrant, Defeaters, and the Epistemic Basis of Religious Belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.
Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Oxford University Press USA.
Plantinga on Warrant and Religious Belief.B. J. C. Madison - 2004 - Dissertation, King's College London
Haverá uma viável objeção de jure à crença teísta?Domingos Faria - 2015 - Evista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade Do Porto – Série de Filosofia 32.
Warrant and Analysis.Joel Pust - 2000 - Analysis 60 (1):51–57.
The Apologetical Implications of Alvin Plantinga's Epistemology.K. Scott Oliphint - 1994 - Dissertation, Westminster Theological Seminary
Infallibilism and Gettier’s Legacy.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):304 - 327.
Plantinga on Warrant.Richard Swinburne - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (2):203-214.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-11

Total views
180 ( #64,218 of 2,498,942 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,210 of 2,498,942 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes