A Critical Analysis of Australian Clinical Ethics Committees and the Functions They Serve

Bioethics 15 (5-6):443-460 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The predominant function of Australian clinical ethics committees (CECs) is policy formation. Some committees have an educational role. Few committees play any direct role in advising on ethics in the management of individual patients and this occurs only in exceptional circumstances. There is a tendency to exaggerate both the number and function of committees. It is suggested that studies of ethics committees, based on questionnaire surveys, should be interpreted cautiously. An examination of ethical issues indicates that there is a role for a critical analysis of power relations in Australian hospitals that is not fulfilled by CECs.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two models of ethics committees.Simon Clarke - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):41-47.
Australian commissions and committees on issues in bioethics.Peter Singer - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):403-424.
The critical turn in clinical ethics and its continous enhancement.Laurence B. McCullough - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):1 – 8.
The protection of patients' rights in clinical trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.


Added to PP

21 (#643,842)

6 months
2 (#725,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?