Arboriculture in Clinical Ethics: Using Philosophical Critical Appraisal to Clear Away Underbrush in Ethical Analysis and Argument

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):1-5 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper introduces the 2011 number of the Journal on Clinical Ethics. Philosophical critical appraisal is essential for the success of philosophical analysis and argument in clinical ethics. To clear away conceptual underbrush, papers in this Clinical Ethics number of the Journal address genetic engineering, conscience-based objections to forms of health care, placebos, and preventing exploitation of patients to be recruited to become research subjects

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to read an ethics paper.Melanie Jansen & Peter Ellerton - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):810-813.
A critical appraisal of evidence‐based medicine: some ethical considerations.M. Gupta - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):111-121.
Philosophical Provocation: The Lifeblood of Clinical Ethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (1):1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-11

Downloads
31 (#129,909)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?