Morally Justifying Oncofertility Research

In Teresa Woodruff, Lori Zoloth, Lisa Campo-Engelstein & Susan Rodriguez (eds.), Oncofertility: Reflections from the Humanities and Social Sciences. New York: Springer. pp. 187-194 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is research aimed at preserving the fertility of cancer patients morally justified? A satisfying answer to this question is missing from the literature on oncofertility. Rather than providing an answer, which is impossible to do in a short space, this chapter explains what it would take to provide such justification.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_14

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reproductive and parental autonomy: an argument for compulsory parental education.Lisa Bortolotti & Daniela Cutas - 2009 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 19 (ethics suppl.):5-14.
Family Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges.Carolyn McLeod & Francoise Baylis (eds.) - 2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Waiting to be born: The ethical implications of the generation of “nuborn” and “nuage” mice from pre-pubertal ovarian tissue.Laurie Zoloth, Leilah Backhus & Teresa Woodruff - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):21 – 29.
Natural versus assisted reproduction. In search of fairness.Daniela Cutas & Lisa Bortolotti - 2010 - Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology 4 (1).
On the Duties of Shared Parenting.Philip Cook - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):168-181.
The Morality of Daycare.Michael McKeon - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (1):97-107.
More on Fathers' Rights.Steven Hales - 1996 - In Robert Almeder & James Humber (eds.), Biomedical Ethics Reviews: Reproduction, Technology, and Rights. pp. 25-34.
Can a Right to Reproduce Justify the Status Quo on Parental Licensing?Andrew Botterell & Carolyn McLeod - 2015 - In Richard Vernon, Sarah Hannan & Samantha Brennan (eds.), Permissible Progeny: The Morality of Procreation and Parenting. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 184-207.
Current versus future, not genes versus parenting.James S. Chisholm & David A. Coall - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):597-598.
On dogs and children: judgements in the realm of meaning.Richard Smith - 2011 - Ethics and Education 6 (2):171-180.
Is Queer Parenting Possible?Shelley M. Park - 2009 - In Rachel Epstein (ed.), Who’s Your Daddy? And Other Writings on Queer Parenting. Toronto: Sumach Press. pp. 316-327.
What All Parents Need to Know? Exploring the Hidden Normativity of the Language of Developmental Psychology in Parenting.Stefan Ramaekers & Judith Suissa - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (3):352-369.
Justifying Community Benefit Requirements in International Research.Robert C. Hughes - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (8):397-404.
The dual selection model: Questions about necessity and completeness.Jeffry A. Simpson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):235-235.
Third party assisted conception: An african perspective.Godfrey B. Tangwa - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):297-306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-29

Downloads
5 (#1,532,334)

6 months
2 (#1,194,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carolyn McLeod
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references