Bradley, James, and Whitehead on Relations

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 3 (3):149 - 169 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay, I provide an exposition of F. H. Bradley's arguments against relations and then critically evaluate his view using arguments advanced by William James and A. N. Whitehead. Against Bradley, I argue for the reality of relations as concrete aspects of the temporal process.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whitehead and Bradley: A Comparative Analysis.Leemon B. McHenry - 1992 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York.
Whitehead’s “Approximation” to Bradley.Lewis S. Ford & Leemon McHenry - 1993 - Idealistic Studies 23 (2-3):103-109.
The Critique of Pure Feeling.James Bradley - 1985 - Process Studies 14 (4):253-264.
Why did Bradley matter to Whitehead?Pierfrancesco Basile - 2004 - Bradley Studies 10 (1-2):15-32.
Relations.Fraser MacBride - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Act, Event, Series: Metaphysics, Mathematics, and Whitehead.James Bradley - 1996 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 10 (4):233 - 248.
Whitehead and Bradley. [REVIEW]Leslie Armour - 1995 - Bradley Studies 1 (2):153-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
62 (#260,076)

6 months
5 (#639,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leemon McHenry
California State University, Northridge

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references