Whitehead and Bradley [Book Review]

Bradley Studies 1 (2):153-155 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At first sight it seems strange to compare Whitehead and Bradley. They were Englishmen and metaphysicians, and they were born within 15 years of one another. But they seem to belong to different eras, for though Whitehead’s fame as a logician belongs to the early years of this century it was only gradually — long after Bradley’s death — that he came to be regarded as a major metaphysician. And in almost every respect they seem to clash.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whitehead and Bradley. [REVIEW]Ernest Wolf-Gazo - 1998 - Process Studies 27 (1):151-153.
Leeman B. McHenry, "Whitehead and Bradley: A Comparative Analysis". [REVIEW]Helmut Maassen - 1993 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (1):116.
Why did Bradley matter to Whitehead?Pierfrancesco Basile - 2004 - Bradley Studies 10 (1-2):15-32.
The Critique of Pure Feeling.James Bradley - 1985 - Process Studies 14 (4):253-264.
Bradley and Bergson a Comparative Study.R. M. Loomba - 1937 - The Upper India Publishing House.
Whitehead, Russell, and Moore.Bogdan Rusu & Ronny Desmet - 2012 - Process Studies 41 (2):214-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
36 (#431,270)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references