What Is the Harm in Gendered Citation Practices?

Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1041-1051 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Women are cited less frequently than men in a variety of scientific fields. Drawing theoretical resources from Fricker and Hookway, I argue that these gendered citation practices constitute a form of participatory epistemic injustice insofar as they prevent female scientists from fully engaging in the epistemic practices of science. Furthermore, Longino’s notion of “uptake” gives us a way of understanding gendered citation practices as an epistemic harm accrued not simply by individuals but by scientific communities as a whole. Finally, I discuss the cumulative harms of this kind of participatory epistemic injustice for individuals and for marginalized groups.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Injustice in the Spaces between Concepts.Fran Fairbairn - 2020 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 58 (1):102-136.
Male sexual victimisation, failures of recognition, and epistemic injustice.Debra L. Jackson - 2022 - In Paul Giladi & Nicola McMillan (eds.), Epistemic injustice and the philosophy of recognition. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 279-296.
Epistemic Injustice and the Attention Economy.Leonie Smith & Alfred Archer - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (5):777-795.
Epistemic Injustice and Performing Know-how.Beth Barker - 2021 - Social Epistemology 35 (6):608-620.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-16

Downloads
49 (#103,641)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Darcy McCusker
University of Washington

Citations of this work

What's the Point of Authors?Joshua Habgood-Coote - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations