Review of Erwin Panofsky, Perspective as Symbolic Form (transl. C.S. Wood), and Martin Kemp, The Science of Art [Book Review]

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (2):84-85 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Could Perspective ever be a Symbolic Form? Revisiting Panofsky with Cassirer.Emmanuel Alloa - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology 2 (1):51-72.
Perspektive, Symbol und symbolische Form. Zum Verhältnis Cassirer – Panofsky.Berthold Hub - 2010 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):144-171.
How perspective could be a symbolic form.Allister Neher - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (4):359–373.
Cassirer, Panofsky, and Warburg: Symbol, Art, and History.Silvia Ferretti & Richard Pierce - 1990 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (3):267-267.
Erwin Panofsky, Three Essays on Style.Daniel Herwitz - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1):66-67.
Cassirer et Panofsky : un malentendu philosophique.Rémi Mermet - 2020 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 22 (1):56-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-06

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
38 (#100,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Maynard
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references