Erwin Panofsky, Leo Steinberg, David carrier: The problem of objectivity in art historical interpretation

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):333-347 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/431133

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Art and its Canons.David Carrier - 1993 - The Monist 76 (4):524-534.
New York art, pittsburgh art, art.David Carrier - 2003 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 37 (3):99-104.
Art and its preservation.David Carrier - 1985 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (3):291-300.
Art and its spectators.David Carrier - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (1):5-17.
Art's spectators.David Carrier - 1988 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46 (3):419-420.
Gombrich and Danto on defining art.David Carrier - 1996 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (3):279-281.
Remembering the past: Art museums as memory theatres.David Carrier - 2003 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61 (1):61–65.
A World Art History and Its Objects by carrier, david.Ivan Gaskell - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):65-68.
Perspektive, Symbol und symbolische Form. Zum Verhältnis Cassirer – Panofsky.Berthold Hub - 2010 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):144-171.
Ekphrasis and interpretation: Two modes of art history writing.David Carrier - 1987 - British Journal of Aesthetics 27 (1):20-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
244 (#78,953)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references