The moral-principle objection to human embryonic stem cell research

Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):190–206 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Opponents of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research claim that such research is incompatible with the moral principle that it is always wrong intentionally to end a human life. In this essay, I discuss how that principle might be revised so that it is subject to as few difficulties as possible. I then argue that even the most defensible version of the principle is compatible with the moral permissibility of hESC research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
223 (#90,278)

6 months
17 (#148,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
Material beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Practical ethics.Peter Singer - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
The Human Animal: Personal Identity Without Psychology.Eric Todd Olson - 1997 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references